Discover more from Cassiopeia Investigates
Womens March Man Face
Regarding the drama over the Womens March changing their logo from three Barbie-faced profiles to a man and two Barbie-faces: they, and TRAs are suggesting it’s simply a representation of a non-white person, or a masculine woman and that Gender Criticals are either racist or believe that all women should look feminine.
Well, I’m still calling it a bloke's face. Lots of women with long, straight noses or larger curved noses were posting their profiles, to say that they feel represented by the man face. However, none of these larger-nosed women actually looked like that face. They all still had female foreheads and jawlines and could not be mistaken for blokes.
Why not have several different types of profile to represent different races? Why have it bloke-barbie-barbie? We know why; to include transwomen.
We’ve heard ‘black women are women’, to justify ‘transwomen are women’… is it now ‘big-nosed women are women’ to help male feelings now too? Make it stop.
Image nicked from @theposieparker on instagram.